![]() ![]() (Opens in a new window)Ĭreative types tend to favor Macs over Windows PCs, and photographers are no exception. Since 1982, PCMag has tested and rated thousands of products to help you make better buying decisions. How to Set Up Two-Factor Authentication.How to Record the Screen on Your Windows PC or Mac.How to Convert YouTube Videos to MP3 Files.How to Save Money on Your Cell Phone Bill.How to Free Up Space on Your iPhone or iPad.How to Block Robotexts and Spam Messages.I await some reviews too bad there's no demo. Or like the situation Alex mentioned, where I want to quickly select images off a card to send to someone. If this could work as a browser/Finder substitute in that situation, it might work for me. OTOH, sometimes I'm looking for a photo for use say in a forum and don't wanna use LR for finding it when I know where it is already. I usually stack those by time, but not always, since sometimes I just prefer one and don't mess with the HDR. In addition I do bracketing for HDR conversion, and so I have a lot of what look like duplicates, but aren't. I got a riMac, and it makes the process a lot faster, since you can see fine detail with more pictures in the grid.Īs far as I can tell with Snapselect the only difference vs LR is that it can group by time, or perhaps by actually looking at the subject? Again, I like that interface and it could help me do a rough culling before import, but wouldn't save me that much time I expect. I don't see an automatic as opposed to manual way of culling them. I guess it depends on if you want to get past the administrative tasks of sifting through your images and move onto working on them faster or do it the manual way. is the argument I hold and by eventually I mean when all of my WD 4TB drives get full. "I'll eventually get around to trashing them". On top each shoot consumes several dozen gigs. For my macro shots, around 70% of them on a given shoot tend to be rejected in LR. Since moving to Lightroom, there hasn't been an easy way and I just end up going through them manually. If you specify a shorter time say 1 second, then some images might not be grouped. I've used the time based mode in Aperture in which you can "stack" images taken within say 3 seconds of each other but, that tends to leave a mess including some from different angles or completely different shots. Nothing really has ventured this close with this new app. I too have used other MacPhun products, most recently, Intensify Pro. Starting from LR2 and now LR5, there hasn't really been all that many "innovative" features, they've just added abilities that you'd expect to have in the first place. then again, this is creating competition for companies like Adobe to actually innovate. Instead I've ventured into using additional apps that offer abilities that go beyond (or improve on) what LR has built in. Thought the Yosemite photos app might help. Was wondering what Apple has to offer since Aperture 3 hasn't really seen any large updates for ages. I shoot wildlife and architecture and most certainly am bogged down by having tons of images to sift through, going back and forth before finding one to start working on. I think it'll be useful for LR users like myself. do photos at actual size show 1:1 on a retina screen? ![]() I do use photo browsers at times without going into Aperture or Lightroom but any info or work I do on the photos needs to be available very easily for those programs.īe interested to see if others like me can make it work. I'd like it to work, as I have the other MacPhun Pro products and love them, but I don't see that this could improve my workflow much. And I like the interface, especially the groupings. I could see it being useful for an Aperture or LR user if you wanted to do a bunch of culls before importing into those programs. I see that you can import from either, but what happens after you've done selections or deletions in Snapselect? It seems you'd have to reimport and/or synchronize in Aperture/LR to get those changes into those programs, and it doesn't appear that the picks get written to metadata. I looked at it, but I'm wondering if it will be useful for a Lightroom and/or Aperture user. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |